Case 6013113/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Riahi v Atyab Al Marshoud Co Ltd FULL MERITS HEARING AT LONDON CENTRAL Heard between: 28-30 October 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013113/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle For
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Riahi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London Central between 28 and 30 October 2025 before Employment Judge Nicolle. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act and harassment related to race under section 26 of the Equality Act failed and were dismissed. Oral reasons were given to the parties, and the judgment records that either party could request written reasons within 14 days of the judgment being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct race discrimination pursuant to section 13 of the Equality Act failed and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given; no written reasons are included in the provided text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claim of harassment related to race pursuant to section 26 of the Equality Act failed and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given; no written reasons are included in the provided text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Equality Act
- section 26 Equality Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.