Case 6013685/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Rehana Bhola v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013685/2024
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Rehana Bhola
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a consent outcome at a private video hearing before Employment Judge O'Rourke. The previous Second Respondent, Ms Louise Hilton, was dismissed from the proceedings.
By consent, the claimant's claims of direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, victimisation, and harassment related to sex were dismissed. The claimant's harassment related to disability claim was narrowed so that it was limited to the allegation of facing a potential threat of dismissal.
The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the remaining limited allegation and does not make any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | By consent, the claim of direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | By consent, the claim of indirect disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | By consent, the victimisation claim was dismissed; the judgment does not specify a protected characteristic for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | By consent, the claim of harassment related to sex was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | By consent, the claim of harassment related to disability was limited to the allegation of facing a potential threat of dismissal; no final upheld or dismissed outcome is recorded for that limited claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.