Case 6013689/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K Gray v Takepayments Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013689/2025
- Decision date
- 6 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Ms. Evans, Ms. Thomas
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff on 25, 26 and 27 November 2025 before Employment Judge Cawthray with lay members Ms Evans and Ms Thomas. The claimant was Mr K Gray and the respondent was Takepayments Limited. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with complaints of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race. It found that those complaints were not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, so both were dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Held not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint was presented outside the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was presented outside the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.