Case 6013895/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Pentney v St Stephens Pre School CIC — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013895/2025
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook Appearances
- Venue
- London East
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Pentney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the video hearing on 29 September 2025 before Employment Judge Hook, Mrs D Pentney appeared in person and the respondent did not appear or respond to the claims. On the claimant's evidence and in the absence of any response from the respondent, the tribunal found the claims for failure to pay redundancy pay and arrears of pay to be well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £861.21 in respect of failure to pay redundancy pay and £1,243.98 in respect of arrears of pay, making a total award of £2,105.19. The judgment states that the sums were gross of tax and that the claimant must ensure the amounts are declared to HMRC and any tax due is paid.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £861 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this claim as arrears of pay and does not specify a further legal basis in the written record. | Upheld | — | £1,244 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,105
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.