Case 6014365/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dyer v Mr R Fear — 2025
- Case reference
- 6014365/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woodhead
- Venue
- by CVP from the Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dyer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that complaint 2.2.1 in the List of Issues was well founded and succeeded as a complaint of harassment related to race. Because it succeeded on that basis, the Tribunal did not also consider it as an act of direct race discrimination.
The Tribunal recorded that complaint 2.2.2 was not well founded either as harassment related to race or as direct race discrimination. Written reasons were not provided in the judgment because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Complaint 2.2.1 of the List of Issues was well founded and succeeded as harassment related to race. The judgment records that it was not also considered as direct race discrimination. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint 2.2.2 of the List of Issues was not well founded as direct race discrimination. The written judgment gives no further reasons because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.