Case 6015543/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Grace v Clubspark Group Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6015543/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Grace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing. The respondent applied to strike out the complaints and was represented by counsel.
The tribunal granted the respondent's application to strike out the breach of contract complaint, and that complaint was dismissed. The tribunal refused the application to strike out the remaining complaints, so the complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and victimisation will continue.
The tribunal also granted the respondent's application for costs and ordered the claimant to pay the respondent 1569 pounds within 21 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The respondent's application to strike out the complaint of breach of contract was successful and that complaint was dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The respondent's application to strike out the complaint of direct race discrimination was refused and the complaint will continue. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The respondent's application to strike out the complaint of harassment related to race was refused and the complaint will continue. | Other | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The respondent's application to strike out the complaint of victimisation was refused and the complaint will continue. | Other | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,569
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.