Mr L Smith v Kier Group plc — 2025

Case reference: 6017283/2024
Decision date: 23 May 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Self

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr L Smith

Respondent

Kier Group plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Mr L Smith's claim against Kier Group Plc. In reasons dated 12 May 2025, Employment Judge Self recorded that by a letter dated 08.03.2025 the tribunal had given the Claimant an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with tribunal orders dated 06.01.2025, 22.01.2025 and 08.03.2025 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.

The Claimant did not respond to that opportunity, and the tribunal accordingly struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the pleaded complaint, any liability finding, or any monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. It records only that the claim was struck out because the Claimant had not complied with tribunal orders dated 06.01.2025, 22.01.2025 and 08.03.2025, and had not actively pursued the claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.