Case 6018842/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Y Ramshaw v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018842/2024
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Y Ramshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public, the Tribunal struck out the complaints of public interest disclosure detriment, sex discrimination, and age discrimination under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal found that, at the relevant times, the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of musculoskeletal impairment to her shoulder. The complaints of direct disability discrimination and/or failure to make reasonable adjustments and/or harassment can therefore proceed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of public interest disclosure detriment was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The complaint of sex discrimination was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint of age discrimination was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant times because of musculoskeletal impairment to her shoulder. The direct disability discrimination and/or failure to make reasonable adjustments complaints can proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The harassment complaint can proceed following the Tribunal's finding that the claimant was a disabled person at the relevant times. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.