Case 6018948/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jasevicius v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6018948/2024
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jasevicius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the final hearing. The respondent attended through its solicitor.
The Judge dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after being satisfied that reasonable enquiries about the claimant's non-attendance had been made. The judgment records that the claimant had notice of the hearing, had not complied with case management orders about preparation, had not contacted the respondent since issuing the claim, had been sent joining details, had provided no advance reason for non-attendance, and did not answer when the clerk telephoned him to secure his attendance by Cloud Video Platform.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim upon the claimant's non-attendance at the final hearing under Rule 47. The claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than detailed particulars in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.