Case 6019364/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Shafiq v Rradar Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019364/2025
- Decision date
- 3 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Shafiq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Shafiq brought complaints of direct race discrimination and direct religious belief discrimination against Rradar Limited. Following a preliminary hearing on 29 July 2025, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £15 for each claim. The deposit order was sent to the claimant on 31 July 2025.
The claimant did not pay the deposits. As a result, the tribunal struck out both complaints under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment records no merits findings on either discrimination complaint and no compensation award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant failed to pay a £15 deposit ordered at the preliminary hearing on 29 July 2025; the order was sent on 31 July 2025. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant failed to pay a £15 deposit ordered at the preliminary hearing on 29 July 2025; the order was sent on 31 July 2025. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.