Case 6019561/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Francis Respondent 1: BUKCS Ltd Respondent 2: Jason James John Blake Respondent 3: Bridlington Manor Carehome v BUKCS Ltd and others — 2025
- Case reference
- 6019561/2025
- Decision date
- 17 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Edwards Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Francis Respondent 1: BUKCS Ltd Respondent 2: Jason James John Blake Respondent 3: Bridlington Manor Carehome
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondents did not attend and had failed to file responses to the claimant's claims. Under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the tribunal gave judgment on the claims.
The complaints against the second and third respondents were dismissed as not well-founded. The unfair dismissal complaint was also dismissed. The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against the first respondent and awarded the gross sum deducted of £13,629.84.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint against the first respondent, finding that it had failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It awarded £3,779.78 for holiday pay, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance on both awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the first respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages between 1 April 2024 and 3 February 2025. | Upheld | — | £13,630 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the first respondent failed to pay holiday pay in accordance with regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £3,780 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,410
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.