Case 6019869/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Baig v Consortio Security Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6019869/2025
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdoch Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Baig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
For remedy, the tribunal applied a 50% Polkey reduction to the compensatory award because there was a real possibility the claimant's employment would have ended in any event if the client still refused to permit him to work on site. It also applied a 5% uplift under section 207A(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 because no investigation was undertaken, while making no reduction for contributory fault.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal complaint was well-founded and records remedy adjustments, but gives no monetary award figures. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Part X Employment Rights Act 1996
- Polkey
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- section 207A(2) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.