Case 6021748/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Y. Siad v Primark Stores Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021748/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Y. Siad
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre on 28 April 2025 before Employment Judge G. King, dealt with the Claimant’s unfair dismissal claim only. The Respondent was represented by counsel and the Claimant appeared in person.
The judgment states that the Claimant’s unfair dismissal claim had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out. No further findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the written record provided.
The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.