Case 6021938/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Evans v Celtic Manor Resort Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6021938/2024
- Decision date
- 18 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- Newport
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss K Evans was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety and depression. It found that she was not a disabled person by reason of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
That disability-status finding meant the complaints of direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and disability-related harassment could proceed. The written record does not record any final determination of those complaints or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety and depression, and said this complaint could proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety and depression, and said this complaint could proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety and depression, and said this complaint could proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of anxiety and depression, and said this complaint could proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.