Case 6022052/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Jeff Angus v EFTEC Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022052/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jeff Angus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Jeff Angus was not dismissed by EFTEC Limited. It therefore concluded that it had no jurisdiction to consider his complaint of unfair dismissal.
The complaints of direct age discrimination and harassment related to age were both found not well-founded and dismissed. The judgment records no monetary remedy or award. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment contains no further findings or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The complaint of direct age discrimination was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to age was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.