Case 6022430/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dziewierski v Mondelez UK Confectionery Production Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6022430/2024
- Decision date
- 26 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Dziewierski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 26 January 2026 at Birmingham (CVP), Employment Judge Edmonds considered limitation issues in Mr A Dziewierski's claims against Mondelez UK Confectionery Production Limited. The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint had been presented outside the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it had been presented within a further reasonable period, so the unfair dismissal claim would proceed.
The tribunal also considered the claimant's direct race discrimination complaint, other than in respect of the appeal against dismissal, and the harassment complaint related to race. It held that those complaints were out of time, but that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit. The judgment records that the claims would therefore proceed and refers to any arguments as to conduct extending over a period.
This judgment contains no findings on the merits of the claims and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was presented outside the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a further reasonable period, so the complaint would proceed. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the direct race discrimination complaint, other than in respect of the claimant's appeal against dismissal, was presented outside the applicable time limit, but extended time on the basis that it was just and equitable to do so; the complaint would proceed. The judgment notes that any arguments as to conduct extending over a period were preserved. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal held that the harassment complaint related to race was presented outside the applicable time limit, but extended time on the basis that it was just and equitable to do so; the complaint would proceed. The judgment notes that any arguments as to conduct extending over a period were preserved. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.