Charlotte Brooks v Nuffield Health — 2026

Case reference: 6022749/2025
Decision date: 6 August 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Shepherd Date

Indexed: 18 August 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Charlotte Brooks

Respondent

Nuffield Health

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Charlotte Brooks's complaint of unfair dismissal. It found that she had worked for Nuffield Health for less than two years and that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring such a complaint.

The claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not give an acceptable reason. The judgment did not affect her other complaints and recorded no remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.