Case 6022906/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Pascall v Dragon Football Academy Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022906/2024
- Decision date
- 31 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Pascall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Slater heard the case by video in Manchester on 26 September 2025. The only substantive finding recorded in the written judgment was that Dragon Football Academy Ltd made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Pascall's wages by failing to pay him for the period 1 to 25 September 2024.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,019, described as the amount unlawfully deducted. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested. The accompanying notice records the tribunal's standard interest information, including a stipulated rate of 8% per annum for the relevant decision day of 31 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for the period 1-25 September 2024, amounting to an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,019 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.