Case 6022931/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Lucy Sneddon 1st v Merevale House Ltd 2nd Respondent: Lynsey Colcough — 2025
- Case reference
- 6022931/2024
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Lucy Sneddon 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 9 December 2025. The respondents were represented by Mr Alex Payton, solicitor, before Employment Judge Gidney sitting by Cloud Video Platform at Midlands West Employment Tribunal.
The Tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims in case 6022931/2024. The dismissed claims were discrimination arising from disability, harassment related to disability, wrongful dismissal in respect of notice pay, and failure to provide a Statement of Terms and Conditions.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the relevant time limit. The text does not set out findings of fact, remedy figures, or any award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies this as a claim of discrimination arising from disability under s15 Equality Act 2010 and dismisses it. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies this as harassment related to disability under s26 Equality Act 2010 and dismisses it. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment identifies this as wrongful dismissal concerning notice pay and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment identifies this as a claim for failure to provide a Statement of Terms and Conditions and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s15 Equality Act 2010
- s26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.