Case 6023184/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Mojili v Marks and Spencer plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023184/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phillips
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Mojili
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short oral judgment recorded in writing by Employment Judge Phillips sitting alone at Nottingham on 24 October 2025. The claimant was Mr M Mojili and the respondent was Marks & Spencer PLC.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for direct sexual orientation discrimination was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the claimant. It also recorded that the claim for sexual orientation harassment was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the claimant.
No findings on liability were made beyond the withdrawals, and no remedy or award was recorded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records that the claim for direct sexual orientation discrimination was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the claim for sexual orientation harassment was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.