Case 6023333/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Hasnat Shahriyar v Pierpoint International (UK) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6023333/2024
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moyler REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Hasnat Shahriyar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 10 July 2025, Employment Judge Moyler heard the claimant's case against Pierpoint International (UK) Limited, which did not attend. The judgment was sent to the parties on 14 August 2025. The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 28 October 2024 to 12 December 2024.
On that claim, the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, £4,577.08, and a further £833.60 to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to the deduction. The claimant was directed to account for any tax or National Insurance on the gross sum. The tribunal also found the notice pay complaint well-founded and awarded £673.08 as damages for breach of contract, using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that tax would be payable on post-employment notice pay.
The tribunal further upheld the breach of contract complaint about expenses and allowances due under the contract of employment. It allowed the claim for a personal pension allowance at 3% of wages and notice pay, refund of a CIPD payment allowance, remote working allowance, IONOS agency email fees, personal laptop usage fee, Zoom Pro subscription, and work phone purchase, and awarded £677.50 in total.
Finally, the tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded, stating that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It awarded £538.48, with the claimant again responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that payment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 28 October 2024 to 12 December 2024 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted (£4,577.08) plus £833.60 for financial loss attributable to the deduction. | Upheld | — | £5,411 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay and awarded £673.08 as damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of tax on post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract complaint concerning expenses and allowances due under the contract of employment and awarded £677.50 in total, made up of the itemised allowances listed in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £678 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded because the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £538 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.