Case 6025089/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Treacy v The Governing Body of Catherine Junior School and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6025089/2025
- Decision date
- 28 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs C Treacy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkinson dismissed Mrs C Treacy's application of 3 November 2025 to amend her claim by adding complaints of direct sex discrimination and harassment related to sex or sexual harassment. The written judgment records the result of the application but does not set out the grounds for refusing the amendment; summary reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The remaining complaint was constructive unfair dismissal. The Tribunal found that it had been presented out of time and that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider it. The claim was dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the application to amend the claim to add this complaint; the written judgment records no determination on its merits. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The Tribunal dismissed the application to amend the claim to add harassment related to sex or sexual harassment; the written judgment records no determination on its merits. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was presented out of time. The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider it and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.