Case 6028593/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Gavin Tickner v DHL Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6028593/2025
- Decision date
- 14 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gavin Tickner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, finding that it was not well-founded.
The Tribunal also dismissed the breach of contract claim because it had no jurisdiction to hear that complaint. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not provide further reasons unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was dismissed because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.