Case 6032928/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Malcolm Ridley v Greenwich Leisure Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6032928/2025
- Decision date
- 5 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Malcolm Ridley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard Malcolm Ridley's unfair dismissal claim against Greenwich Leisure Limited at Newcastle by CVP on 4 and 5 June 2026 before Employment Judge Loy. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Cliffe, its People Business Partner.
The judgment recorded that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The written record did not set out the tribunal's reasons, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed; reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.