Case 6033285/2025 · Employment Tribunal
the Claimant attended without a representative For the v Mr D. Campion — 2026
- Case reference
- 6033285/2025
- Decision date
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Hunt Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
the Claimant attended without a representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M. Hunt allowed High Point Solutions Ltd's strike-out application in part. The Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction over the complaints brought under the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and the Working Time Regulations 1998 because they had been brought too late. The complaints struck out included unfair dismissal, pleaded whistleblowing detriment, unauthorised deductions from wages including holiday pay, breach of contract including wrongful dismissal, and the Working Time Regulations complaints.
The disability discrimination and disability harassment complaints were struck out as having been brought too late. The victimisation complaint was also struck out on that basis.
The sexual orientation discrimination and harassment complaints were struck out except insofar as they concerned alleged unfavourable treatment or unwanted conduct related to colleagues' allegations that Ms Smart was promiscuous or concerning her sexual orientation. The judgment stated that this remaining part required further clarification and could proceed only in relation to actions culminating in, and including, the accusation that Ms Smart had taken drugs at a client event in or around February 2025. Any complaint that her dismissal was discriminatory or constituted harassment was struck out.
The judgment determined the partial strike-out application and did not record a final determination of the surviving allegations or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
12 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out for want of jurisdiction because it was brought too late. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The pleaded whistleblowing detriment complaint was struck out for want of jurisdiction because it was brought too late. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaints, including deductions concerning holiday pay, were struck out for want of jurisdiction because they were brought too late. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was identified within the unauthorised deduction from wages complaints struck out for having been brought too late. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | All complaints under the Working Time Regulations 1998 were struck out for want of jurisdiction because they were brought too late. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaints, which included wrongful dismissal, were struck out for want of jurisdiction because they were brought too late. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.