Case 8000027/2024 · Employment Tribunal

ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000027/2024 Held on June 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss Audrey Rezin v Robert Gordon University — 2024

Case reference: 8000027/2024
Decision date: 18 June 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000027/2024 Held on June 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss Audrey Rezin

Respondent

Robert Gordon University

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 11 June 2024, Employment Judge N M Hosie heard the case between Miss Audrey Rezin and Robert Gordon University. In the judgment issued on 18 June 2024, the tribunal held that the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. For that reason, the claimant’s complaints of disability discrimination were dismissed.

The tribunal also refused the claimant’s application to amend. The judgment records that the case should now proceed to a final hearing on the merits of the constructive unfair dismissal complaint only. No financial award was made in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The tribunal held that the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, and the disability discrimination complaints were dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.