Case 8000062/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Nijloveanu v Vigilant Security (Scotland) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000062/2023
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
- Venue
- Glagow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Nijloveanu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an Open Preliminary Hearing, the tribunal dismissed the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims. It also dealt with the claimant's application to amend her claim to add holiday pay and race discrimination claims, refusing the amendment in relation to holiday pay but allowing it in relation to race discrimination.
The tribunal further held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant's unfair dismissal claim because she did not have qualifying continuous employment. The amended judgment records no monetary award and no merits determination beyond these preliminary rulings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant lacked qualifying continuous employment. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's application to amend the claim to add a holiday pay claim was refused. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The claimant's application to amend the claim to add race discrimination was allowed. The judgment records no merits determination on the race discrimination claim. | Other | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.