Case 8000195/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Clifford v Mitie Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000195/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Clifford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded complaints of unfair dismissal and race discrimination presented by Mr G Clifford against Mitie Limited on 22 December 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal's judgment was that it did not have jurisdiction under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 120 of the Equality Act 2010 to hear those complaints. The written judgment states that oral reasons were provided to the parties at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to hear the unfair dismissal complaint presented on 22 December 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction under section 120 of the Equality Act 2010 to hear the race discrimination complaint presented on 22 December 2022. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 120 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.