Case 8000236/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Allan v Caledonian MacBrayne Crewing (Guernsey)Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 8000236/2023
- Decision date
- 20 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Allan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Caledonian MacBrayne Crewing (Guernsey) Limited as a ship's cook from 5 April 2017 until his dismissal for capability (ill health) in early 2023. The tribunal heard a preliminary hearing on disability status and time limits. It accepted that both witnesses were honest and found there were no real disputes of fact. The claimant had bursitis affecting his right hip, went off sick on 23 February 2022, and later returned on a phased basis after occupational health and ENG1 medical assessments.
The tribunal held that bursitis was a physical impairment and that it adversely affected the claimant's ability to sleep, walk, sit and bend down. However, because the relevant period began before the 12-month anniversary of the onset of that substantial adverse effect, and there was no medical evidence showing that the condition was likely to last at least 12 months at the earlier dates, the claimant was found to have become disabled only from around mid-January 2023. On that basis, the direct discrimination claim and the reasonable-adjustments complaint relating to the phased return on his own vessel in September 2022 were dismissed, as were disability claims relating to acts before he was disabled.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal construed the 13 January 2023 termination letter and the oral discussion on 12 January 2023 as giving seven weeks' notice rather than immediate termination in lieu of notice. It therefore held that the effective date of termination was 3 March 2023. The unfair dismissal claim was accordingly in time. The tribunal also said that, if that construction were wrong, it would have extended time because the claimant reasonably believed his employment was continuing while his salary and payslips continued to be paid and the respondent did not explain the payroll mistake.
For the disability discrimination claims, acts before 25 January 2023 were out of time, but the claims arising from the capability dismissal effective 3 March 2023 and the appeal outcome on 20 March 2023 were in time. Those remaining claims, together with any unresolved time-bar questions about conduct extending over a period or a just and equitable extension, were reserved for the full hearing. No monetary award was made at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination claim under s.13 EqA 2010. Dismissed because the tribunal held the claimant was not disabled at the time of the alleged acts in August 2022, 14 September to mid-December 2022, and 12 January 2023. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim concerning not being allowed a phased return on his own vessel and being required instead to carry out the phased return on other vessels from 14 September to mid-December 2022. Dismissed because the claimant was not yet disabled at that time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim concerning the capability dismissal effective 3 March 2023 and the appeal outcome on 20 March 2023. Held to be in time and left to proceed to the full hearing; merits not determined at this stage. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments claim under ss.20-21 EqA 2010 about not allowing a phased return on the claimant's own vessel with the ENG1 restrictions as adjustments on 14 September 2022. Dismissed because the claimant was not yet disabled. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 para 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 para 5(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.140B Equality Act 2010
- s.97 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Wall's Meat v Khan
- Adams v GKN Sankey Ltd
- Chapman v Letheby and Christopher Ltd
- Leech v Preston Borough Council
- British Gas Services Ltd v McCaull
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.