Case 8000683/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000683/2024 Mr J Wallis v Selman Marine Design Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000683/2024
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000683/2024 Mr J Wallis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge M Kearns recorded that the respondent, Selman Marine Design Ltd, had failed to give Mr J Wallis any pay statement in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unnotified deductions during the period of thirteen weeks immediately preceding the date of the claim. Both matters were upheld on the material before the tribunal.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Wallis the aggregate sum of £184.93. The judgment does not set out any separate split between the two findings or any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the respondent failed to give the claimant any pay statement in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unnotified deductions during the period of thirteen weeks immediately preceding the date of the claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £185
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.