Case 8000708/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Z Ouchrif v Aspire Housing and Personal Development — 2025
- Case reference
- 8000708/2025
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Mannion
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Z Ouchrif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent harassed the claimant by subjecting her to mocking comments about her accent and telling her that if she wished to live in Scotland she should 'learn how to speak Scottish', and that the same conduct amounted to direct race discrimination. The harassment was not a single incident but occurred over approximately nine or ten shifts across a two-month period and ceased only because of the claimant's annual leave and the respondent placing the other employee on paid leave.
The tribunal also upheld a victimisation claim, finding that the respondent failed to provide an outcome to the claimant's grievance and failed to support or manage her sickness absence. The judge found that this lack of resolution and contact left the grievance and the basis for the claimant's absence as live, ongoing issues and contributed to the continuing nature of her mental health difficulties.
Applying the Vento bands as at April 2024, the tribunal assessed injury to feelings at £15,000, placed at the lower end of the middle band, declining to increase the award for the overlapping harassment and direct discrimination findings to avoid double recovery. Interest of £1,433.42 was awarded under the Employment Tribunal (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Claims) Regulations 1996, calculated at 8% over 436 days from 2 October 2024 to the date of the reserved judgment, producing a total award of £16,433.42.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to race: mocking comments about the claimant's accent and being told that if she wished to live in Scotland she should 'learn how to speak Scottish'. Injury to feelings award not split per claim to avoid double recovery with direct discrimination claim arising from the same conduct. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination arising from the same conduct as the harassment claim. Tribunal noted that a separate award would amount to double recovery. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Respondent failed to provide an outcome to the claimant's grievance and failed to support her during her sickness absence. Single aggregate injury to feelings award of £15,000 covers all three upheld claims; interest of £1,433.42 added. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,433
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- Section 136 Equality Act 2010
- Section 13 Equality Act 2010
- Section 23 Equality Act 2010
- Section 26 Equality Act 2010
- Igen Ltd v Wong [2005] ICR 931
- Lang v Manchester City Council [2006] ICR 1519 EAT
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc [2007] ICR 876
- Ayodele v Citylink Limited [2018] ICR 748
- Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd v English EAT 0316/10
- Vento bands (April 2024)
- Employment Tribunal (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Claims) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.