Case 8000887/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000887/2024 Mr A Coulson v Edinburgh Construction Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 8000887/2024
- Decision date
- 20 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster Employment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000887/2024 Mr A Coulson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, the Employment Judge found that Edinburgh Construction Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,307.40 net.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,777.88 gross, described as 2 weeks' pay. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay a redundancy payment to which the claimant was entitled and ordered £1,286.00.
The judgment further recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £522.96 net, described as 4 days at £130.74 per day. The hearing listed for 4 September 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,307.40. | Upheld | — | £1,307 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,777.88 gross, described as 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,778 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay redundancy pay due and ordered £1,286.00. | Upheld | — | £1,286 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered the net sum of £522.96, described as 4 days at £130.74 per day. | Upheld | — | £523 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,894
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.