Case 8000931/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000931/2024 Held in Inverness on 25, 26, 27, & August 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Members N Quinn S Larkin Mr J Heerlyn
The Tribunal sat in Inverness with Employment Judge J M Hendry and members N Quinn and S Larkin. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel, instructed by a solicitor.
The judgment records that, for reasons given orally at the close of the hearing on 29 August 2025, the unanimous decision was to dismiss all listed claims. Those claims were unfair (“constructive”) dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, and victimisation.
The written judgment does not set out the oral reasons or any remedy decision. No monetary award was made in the written judgment because all claims were dismissed.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as Unfair (“constructive”) dismissal and records that it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments claim under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed; the judgment lists it alongside disability discrimination claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.