Case 8001004/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Panama v Lifeways Community Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001004/2025
- Decision date
- 7 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Panama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a black Nigerian probationary support worker, alleged direct race discrimination and harassment related to race arising from events on 23 December 2024, the respondent's handling of statements from another worker, and her dismissal on 7 February 2025. The tribunal found that some alleged conduct by Carol Shea did not occur: she did not say she did not speak to "the likes of me", did not shout and swear at the claimant, did not forcibly remove her from a taxi, and did not say she would make sure the claimant never worked at the residence again.
The tribunal found that Carol Shea did instruct the claimant to take a service user by bus rather than taxi, and did say words to the effect that if it were up to her none of the claimant and another worker would work at the residence again. It found no facts from which it could reasonably infer that those matters were because of, or related to, race. It accepted the respondent's explanation that the instruction and comment related to the service user's interests and the refusal to take the service user by bus.
The tribunal also found that Grace Wright had not received a statement from Mary Fasoyin and had repeatedly tried to obtain one. It found no facts from which it could reasonably infer that the dismissal was because of or related to race, and accepted that the dismissal related to Grace Wright's genuine belief in misconduct following a reasonable investigation commensurate with the claimant's probationary status. The complaints of race discrimination were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal adjudicated complaints of direct race discrimination, including alleged discriminatory dismissal, and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal adjudicated harassment related to race based on the same factual allegations and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
17 references- Section 13 Equality Act 2010
- Section 26 Equality Act 2010
- Section 30 Equality Act 2010
- Section 23 Equality Act 2010
- Section 136 Equality Act 2010
- Shamoon v The Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- R (E) v Governing Body of JFS
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Igen v Wong
- Madarassy v Nomura International Plc
- Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
- Efobi v Royal Mail Group
- Laing v Manchester City Council
- Barton v Investec
- Network Rail Infrastructure Limited v Griffiths Henry
- Pemberton v Inwood
- Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.