Case 8001033/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001033/2024 L Mcleod v Edinburgh Construction Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001033/2024
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001033/2024 L Mcleod
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £584.22.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £438.17. In addition, the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and was ordered to pay £408.95 gross for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £876.33. The judgment allowed the respondent to deduct Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions, if applicable, from the gross sums ordered at paragraphs 1 and 3, provided those deductions were remitted to HMRC and written evidence was supplied to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £584 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £409 |
| Breach of contract | The breach was stated to be in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,308
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.