Case 8001302/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001302/2024 Miss K O’Neill v The Nail and Beauty Zone Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001302/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001302/2024 Miss K O’Neill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge awarded the claimant Miss K O’Neill a gross sum of £486.40 in relation to an unauthorised deduction from wages. The calculation recorded in the judgment was £738.91 less £252.51, reflecting a payment made on 31/08/2024 and described as 6 weeks and 1 day at the SSP rate of £116.75 per week.
The tribunal also awarded £265.40 for accrued holiday pay, calculated as 23.2 hours at £11.44 per hour. The judgment did not split the award into broader compensation heads and did not record any separate findings beyond the stated calculations.
The respondent was given liberty to deduct Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions, if required by law, and to remit those deductions to HMRC with written evidence to the claimant. The judgment stated that payment of the balance to the claimant would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay of £265.40, calculated as 23.2 hours at £11.44 per hour. | Upheld | — | £265 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross sum of £486.40, calculated as £738.91 less £252.51 payment made on 31/08/2024, described as 6 weeks and 1 day at the SSP rate of £116.75 per week. | Upheld | — | £486 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £752
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.