Case 8001381/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8001381/2024 Mr D Johnson v Forestry and Land Scotland — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001381/2024
- Decision date
- 5 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8001381/2024 Mr D Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 19 February 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr D Johnson an opportunity to provide written reasons by 05 March 2025 or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Jones therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). The text does not identify a specific claim type in the decision itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.