Case 8001800/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number:8001800/2025 T Price v Adarma Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001800/2025
- Decision date
- 17 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number:8001800/2025 T Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because no response was presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in administration, and the administrator consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 06 August 2025.
The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed more than 100 employees at one establishment within a period of 45 days or less, and that the claimant was dismissed as redundant on 14 July 2025. It held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188. It therefore made a protective award in respect of the claimant as an employee dismissed as redundant at the respondent’s establishment at 3rd Floor, Quay 1, 133 Fountainbridge, EH3 9QG.
The protected period was stated to begin on 14 July 2025 and to last for 90 days. The judgment orders the respondent to pay remuneration for that protected period, but the extracted text does not give a separate monetary figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment does not state a quantified monetary sum; it orders payment of remuneration for the protected period, which begins on 14 July 2025 and lasts 90 days. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULR(C)A 1992
- section 188A TULR(C)A 1992
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.