Case 8001844/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8001844/2025 Miss S Brown v Adarma Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001844/2025
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8001844/2025 Miss S Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No response was presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in administration, and the administrator consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 06 August 2025.
The Tribunal found that the respondent dismissed more than 100 employees as redundant at one establishment within a period of 45 days or less. The claimant was dismissed as redundant on 14 July 2025. The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was held to be well founded because employee representatives were not elected in accordance with section 188A and the respondent did not then consult with them in accordance with section 188.
The Tribunal accordingly made a protective award in respect of the claimant as an employee dismissed as redundant at the respondent’s establishment at 3rd Floor, Quay 1, 133 Fountainbridge, EH3 9QG. The protected period began on 14 July 2025 and lasted for 90 days. The extracted judgment records an order for remuneration for the protected period, but it does not state a specific monetary sum in the text supplied here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment states that the complaint was well founded and that the Tribunal made a protective award, but the extracted text does not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.