Case 8001888/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number:8001888/2025 Mr C Cottam v Adarma Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001888/2025
- Decision date
- 20 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number:8001888/2025 Mr C Cottam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 22 judgment on the available material because no response was presented within the applicable time limit. It recorded that the claimant, Mr C Cottam, was an employee dismissed as redundant and therefore entitled to bring the complaint, which concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives. The respondent, Adarma Limited (In Administration), was in administration, and the administrator consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 14 August 2025.
The tribunal found the complaint well founded. It held that the respondent dismissed more than 100 employees at one establishment within a period of 45 days or less, and that the claimant was dismissed as redundant on 14 July 2025. It also found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188 of that Act.
As a result, the tribunal made a protective award in respect of the claimant as an employee dismissed as redundant at the respondent's establishment at 3rd Floor, Quay 1, 133 Fountainbridge, EH3 9QG. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period. The protected period began on 14 July 2025 and was 90 days. The extracted text does not state the amount payable under the protective award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The complaint was that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in relation to collective consultation and election of employee representatives. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and made a protective award. The extracted text does not state a monetary figure for the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.