Case 8001901/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8001901/2025 K Stephenson v Adarma Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001901/2025
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8001901/2025 K Stephenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No response was presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in administration, and the administrator consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 27 August 2025.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimant had been dismissed as redundant. It found that the respondent dismissed more than 100 employees as redundant at one establishment within 45 days or less, that the claimant was dismissed on 14 July 2025, and that the respondent failed to ensure employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then to consult with them in accordance with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The complaint was therefore well founded and the tribunal made a protective award in respect of the claimant at the respondent’s establishment at 3rd Floor, Quay 1, 133 Fountainbridge, EH3 9QG. The protected period began on 14 July 2025 and lasted 90 days. The extracted text records an order to pay remuneration for that protected period, but it does not state a cash amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal held the complaint well founded and ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days starting on 14 July 2025, but no monetary figure was stated in the extracted judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.