Loading…

Sex discrimination cases against And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Sex discrimination cases against And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving sex discrimination claims against And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all sex discrimination cases across every employer.

Sex discrimination cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All sex discrimination cases against And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4104196/2023	17 March 2024	Scotland	Ms Nadine-Anne Harkness	Sex discrimination	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The's tribunal cases tagged with sex discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.