Case 4104196/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Nadine-Anne Harkness v ’S APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS, WASTED COSTS AND STRIKEOUT FOLLOWING MEMBERS’ DAY ON FEBRUARY 2024 Summary 1. These applications are made by the — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104196/2023
- Decision date
- 17 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R King
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
20 namedMs Nadine-Anne Harkness
- ’S APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS, WASTED COSTS AND STRIKEOUT FOLLOWING MEMBERS’ DAY ON FEBRUARY 2024 Summary 1. These applications are made by the
- Had in turn provided the names of three comparators. • As a result, the
- Sought to advance a case that the three named comparators were not the only relevant comparators and that the entire group of male aviation firefighters on Tier terms and conditions were relevant comparators. • The
- Was Directed to Provide the
- And the Tribunal with a full list of the named comparators she relied upon. Applications for costs and wasted costs 3. The
- Makes an application for costs and wasted costs associated with the first day of the hearing. The
- And/or her representative,25 Mr Bathgate, because they failed in advance to name all relevant comparators in the claim. As a result, it prepared its defence only in relation to the three named comparators, which it believed it was reasonably entitled to do. In fact, those comparators were the only comparators she had named in her evidence. The
- ’s response 5. In response Mr Bathgate explains that he only received the hearing bundle on January ahead of the hearing on January. He only then became aware that the
Claims brought
1 categoryOutcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.