Loading…

Sought to advance a case that the three named comparators were not the only relevant comparators and that the entire group of male aviation firefighters on Tier terms and conditions were relevant comparators. • The — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Sought to advance a case that the three named comparators were not the only relevant comparators and that the entire group of male aviation firefighters on Tier terms and conditions were relevant comparators. • The

Since 2017, Sought to advance a case that the three named comparators were not the only relevant comparators and that the entire group of male aviation firefighters on Tier terms and conditions were relevant comparators. • The has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Sex discrimination

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Sex discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4104196/2023	17 March 2024	Scotland	Ms Nadine-Anne Harkness	Sex discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.