Acted reasonably in proceeding on the basis that the named comparators 4104196/2023 Page were ‘three of the comparators’’ and not all of them. The application for costs is therefore opposed for all those reasons. The Tribunal’s deliberations Costs 8. Rule provides that:5 (1) The Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order and shall consider whether to do so where it considers that: (a) a party (or that party’s representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in either the bringing of the proceedings (or part) or the way that the proceedings (or part) have been conducted.” 9. The Tribunal concludes that the course of the hearing on January 2024 was materially affected by a genuine misunderstanding between the parties as to the extent of the case. 10. The Tribunal takes full account of the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch
Employer file
Acted reasonably in proceeding on the basis that the named comparators 4104196/2023 Page were ‘three of the comparators’’ and not all of them. The application for costs is therefore opposed for all those reasons. The Tribunal’s deliberations Costs 8. Rule provides that:5 (1) The Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order and shall consider whether to do so where it considers that: (a) a party (or that party’s representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in either the bringing of the proceedings (or part) or the way that the proceedings (or part) have been conducted.” 9. The Tribunal concludes that the course of the hearing on January 2024 was materially affected by a genuine misunderstanding between the parties as to the extent of the case. 10. The Tribunal takes full account of the
Since 2017, Acted reasonably in proceeding on the basis that the named comparators 4104196/2023 Page were ‘three of the comparators’’ and not all of them. The application for costs is therefore opposed for all those reasons. The Tribunal’s deliberations Costs 8. Rule provides that:5 (1) The Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order and shall consider whether to do so where it considers that: (a) a party (or that party’s representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in either the bringing of the proceedings (or part) or the way that the proceedings (or part) have been conducted.” 9. The Tribunal concludes that the course of the hearing on January 2024 was materially affected by a genuine misunderstanding between the parties as to the extent of the case. 10. The Tribunal takes full account of the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.