Employer × claim type

Sex discrimination cases against Acted reasonably in proceeding on the basis that the named comparators 4104196/2023 Page were ‘three of the comparators’’ and not all of them. The application for costs is therefore opposed for all those reasons. The Tribunal’s deliberations Costs 8. Rule provides that:5 (1) The Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order and shall consider whether to do so where it considers that: (a) a party (or that party’s representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in either the bringing of the proceedings (or part) or the way that the proceedings (or part) have been conducted.” 9. The Tribunal concludes that the course of the hearing on January 2024 was materially affected by a genuine misunderstanding between the parties as to the extent of the case. 10. The Tribunal takes full account of the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving sex discrimination claims against Acted reasonably in proceeding on the basis that the named comparators 4104196/2023 Page were ‘three of the comparators’’ and not all of them. The application for costs is therefore opposed for all those reasons. The Tribunal’s deliberations Costs 8. Rule provides that:5 (1) The Tribunal may make a costs order or a preparation time order and shall consider whether to do so where it considers that: (a) a party (or that party’s representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably in either the bringing of the proceedings (or part) or the way that the proceedings (or part) have been conducted.” 9. The Tribunal concludes that the course of the hearing on January 2024 was materially affected by a genuine misunderstanding between the parties as to the extent of the case. 10. The Tribunal takes full account of the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all sex discrimination cases across every employer.