Loading…

’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal WatchEmployers’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the

Employer file

’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the

Since 2017, ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 2 August 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Disability discrimination

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.