Loading…

Disability discrimination cases against ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Disability discrimination cases against ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving disability discrimination claims against ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all disability discrimination cases across every employer.

Disability discrimination cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All disability discrimination cases against ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of ’ application to amend the ET should be allowed. A Joint Bundle was prepared for today’s PH, with page numbers from - 110. The documents in that Bundle which are mentioned in this decision are referred to by their page number in that Bundle (JB – JB 110) 4110004/2021 Page 2. A PH for the purposes of case management took place over the phone on September 2021. In the Note issued following that Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing (‘TCMPH’), it is recorded that the ET initiated claims for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 relying on the protected characteristics of pregnancy and disability and referred to an incident where there were no suitable arrangements for breast feeding, as well as the's tribunal cases tagged with disability discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.