Loading…

Other cases against Being required to deduct such sums as required by law from that gross sum.25 2. In terms of Section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Tribunal declares that the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Other cases against Being required to deduct such sums as required by law from that gross sum.25 2. In terms of Section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Tribunal declares that the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving other claims against Being required to deduct such sums as required by law from that gross sum.25 2. In terms of Section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Tribunal declares that the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all other cases across every employer.

Other cases: 1
Total awarded: £936
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All other cases against Being required to deduct such sums as required by law from that gross sum.25 2. In terms of Section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Tribunal declares that the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4102606/2020	26 October 2022	Scotland	: I Ashraf and A Grant Mr K McDonagh	Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Other, Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	£936

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Being required to deduct such sums as required by law from that gross sum.25 2. In terms of Section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Tribunal declares that the's tribunal cases tagged with other in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.