Loading…

Did not raise health and safety concerns re that meeting, and that she did not suffer a detriment as a result of raising concerns. It is their position that if the amendment re the section ERA claim is allowed, an 4110004/2021 Page application for that claim to be struck out on the basis of no reasonable prospects of success will be made by the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Did not raise health and safety concerns re that meeting, and that she did not suffer a detriment as a result of raising concerns. It is their position that if the amendment re the section ERA claim is allowed, an 4110004/2021 Page application for that claim to be struck out on the basis of no reasonable prospects of success will be made by the

Since 2017, Did not raise health and safety concerns re that meeting, and that she did not suffer a detriment as a result of raising concerns. It is their position that if the amendment re the section ERA claim is allowed, an 4110004/2021 Page application for that claim to be struck out on the basis of no reasonable prospects of success will be made by the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 2 August 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Disability discrimination

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.